![]() ![]() After a preset duration, the screen would either go blank or switch to some sort of animated display.Īs time went on, though, monitors became cheaper and less prone to image burn. You can see pronounced examples of image burn on many old dumb terminals that were routinely used for the same application every single day.īecause of the expense of computer monitors in the past, screen savers were designed to prevent image burn. This results in that portion of the screen getting hot and burning the image permanently into the screen. Image burn occurs when the same image is left on the screen for long periods of time. Older types of monitors were prone to a phenomenon called image burn. The main reason for implementing screen savers was originally to prolong the life span of computer monitors. In this Daily Drill Down, I’ll address some of those issues and discuss how they can affect you. However, there are some serious issues to consider when determining whether to allow screen savers in your organization. Network administrators have been having this debate since the early days of Windows 3.0. The question of whether screen savers do more harm than good is not a new one. In this Daily Drill Down, Brien Posey discusses the pros and cons of screen savers. Network administrators have been debating whether screen savers do more harm than good since the early days of Windows 3.0. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |